<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/css/feed.css"?>
<rss xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Same-Sex Marriage Heads to the Supreme Court (The Takeaway)</title>
<link>//podcastplus.net/feed/podcast~4d5c8769240da77908557ce76d1b3f4e2a59766554419b984b4e18e6513ee56f</link>
<description>Loading... About UsThe Takeaway is a daily national news program focused on you. What you know and what you share helps to shape our daily discussion. You can hear us weekdays across America (check out our station map below - all times Monday through Friday unless otherwise indicated).The Takeaway is driven by America's national conversation — if a conversation connects or you have a valuable perspective, we want you to share your experience. These contributions help us deliver fresh insights and analysis on the day’s news.Here's how you can take part:FacebookFind us on Facebook to see our latest conversations in your NewsFeed. Check out some of our photo albums and videos, or comment on a discussion thread. You can also send a message to our inbox if there is a story you want us to cover.TwitterFollow us on Twitter @TheTakeaway to get updates from the program and our guests. Have a question about something you heard? Disagree with something you heard? Keep the debate going on Twitter. You can also follow our own Melissa Harris-Perry.InstagramFollow us on Instagram for BTS moments of the showEmailNot into Twitter or Facebook? You can always reach The Takeaway by sending us an email at takeawaydigital@gmail.com. TextSign up for The Takeaway's listener response network by texting the word "START" to 70101. You will receive a daily question that will be featured on the next day's show. We ask listeners in our response network to call in to our program and share their thoughts. Standard data and messaging rates may apply. You can always text the word "STOP" at any time to opt-out.Call UsYou can always contact us by calling us at 1-877-8-MY-TAKE. Each day, The Takeaway features the voices of listeners from around the country. Share your thoughts and opinions by leaving us a voicemail.Our House RulesIf you’re taking part on air and or online, here are a few things you should know:If you contact us in public—on Twitter or on our Facebook threads—we may read your comments out on the radio, along with the name and location you make public. We may also repost your comment online.If you contact us in private—in the Facebook private inbox or via email—then we may read out your comment on air. If you don’t want your name, location or comment made public, please tell us and we will respect your wishes.We monitor our public Facebook threads. If your comment has been deleted, we will be happy to explain to you why, if you message us to ask. Equally, if you feel a comment should be deleted but hasn’t been, please flag it to us by messaging us. We will either take action or explain to you why we feel the comment should remain.On Twitter, we may retweet or repost one of your tweets on The Takeaway feed. If you text us, we may read your message and location on the air.Thank you for taking part in The Takeaway. The Takeaway is a partnership of global news leaders. It is a co-production of PRX and WNYC Radio in collaboration with WGBH-Boston Public Radio. Please see our music credits for more information about the music used on the show.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Reading the Tea Leaves on Same-Sex Marriage</title>
<link>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032813-liptak.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278625</link>
<description>  This week, the Supreme Court heard two potentially historic cases on same-sex marriage:  Hollingsworth v. Perry  , the Proposition 8 case out of California, and  United States v. Windsor  , the case that will determine the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA.   Now the justices retreat to their respective quarters to decide the fate of Proposition 8, DOMA, and, potentially, the future of marriage as an institution in the United States.   Wednesday's  arguments  in United States v. Windsor seemed to indicated that a majority of the justices will rule DOMA unconstitutional. Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court's resident swing justice, noted in oral argument that DOMA "is not consistent with the historic commitment of marriage and — and of questions of — of the rights of children to the State."   Justice Ginsburg echoed her colleague's sentiment. "It's not as though, well, there's this little Federal sphere and it's only a tax question," she said. "It's — it's — as Justice Kennedy ...</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032813-liptak.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278625</guid>
<enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032813-liptak.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=278625" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reading the Tea Leaves on Same-Sex Marriage</title>
<link>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032813-liptak.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278625</link>
<description>  This week, the Supreme Court heard two potentially historic cases on same-sex marriage:  Hollingsworth v. Perry  , the Proposition 8 case out of California, and  United States v. Windsor  , the case that will determine the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA.   Now the justices retreat to their respective quarters to decide the fate of Proposition 8, DOMA, and, potentially, the future of marriage as an institution in the United States.   Wednesday's  arguments  in United States v. Windsor seemed to indicated that a majority of the justices will rule DOMA unconstitutional. Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court's resident swing justice, noted in oral argument that DOMA "is not consistent with the historic commitment of marriage and — and of questions of — of the rights of children to the State."   Justice Ginsburg echoed her colleague's sentiment. "It's not as though, well, there's this little Federal sphere and it's only a tax question," she said. "It's — it's — as Justice Kennedy ...</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032813-liptak.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278625</guid>
<enclosure url="https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032813-liptak.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=278625" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legacy and the Supremes: A Psychoanalytic Look at the Court</title>
<link>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032713-scotus.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278390</link>
<description>  Every judge claims impartiality, that he or she renders decisions based on the facts in the cast at hand, but Supreme Court justices are in a particular spotlight, both today and in terms of their historical legacy.   Justice Anthony Kennedy is the resident swing vote on the Supreme Court, a role he seems to relish.    Rick Hasen   , professor of law at the University of California, Irvine and author of the  Election Law Blog  , argues that the justices’ legacy may have more to do with their decision-making than most Americans realize. He says that the legacy question may sway Justice Kennedy to the left on the same-sex marriage cases before the court this week.    Supreme Court watchers, Hasen  writes  , "often use amateur psychoanalysis of the justices."   "For example," he continues, "a chief justice, feeling constrained by public opinion or concerned about the court's legacy, may give in on one case in order to gain more political capital to spend on another controversial case."    Our Washington co...</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032713-scotus.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278390</guid>
<enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032713-scotus.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=278390" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legacy and the Supremes: A Psychoanalytic Look at the Court</title>
<link>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032713-scotus.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278390</link>
<description>  Every judge claims impartiality, that he or she renders decisions based on the facts in the cast at hand, but Supreme Court justices are in a particular spotlight, both today and in terms of their historical legacy.   Justice Anthony Kennedy is the resident swing vote on the Supreme Court, a role he seems to relish.    Rick Hasen   , professor of law at the University of California, Irvine and author of the  Election Law Blog  , argues that the justices’ legacy may have more to do with their decision-making than most Americans realize. He says that the legacy question may sway Justice Kennedy to the left on the same-sex marriage cases before the court this week.    Supreme Court watchers, Hasen  writes  , "often use amateur psychoanalysis of the justices."   "For example," he continues, "a chief justice, feeling constrained by public opinion or concerned about the court's legacy, may give in on one case in order to gain more political capital to spend on another controversial case."    Our Washington co...</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032713-scotus.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278390</guid>
<enclosure url="https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032713-scotus.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=278390" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are Gay Rights More Akin to Civil Rights or Religious Rights?</title>
<link>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-civilrights.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=277655</link>
<description>  This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider two gay marriage cases.   Tomorrow, they hear arguments on Hollingsworth v. Perry, a case that centers on the state constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriages in California — also known as Proposition 8. A federal appeals court ruled it unconstitutional in 2012, but supporters are asking for the Supreme Court to review the ruling.   On Wednesday, there's United States v. Windsor. This case challenges the federal Defense of Marriage Act, adopted in 1996, which prohibits most federal benefits from going to gay married couples.    Reverend Oliver White  is the pastor of Grace Community United Church of Christ, a predominantly black congregation in St. Paul, Minnesota. He  announced his acceptance  of same-sex marriage in 2005, when, at a United Church of Christ assembly, he voted in favor of a church resolution for gay marriage. He sees gay rights as akin to black civil rights.   But  Ann Pellegrini  disagrees. She is white and gay and says she doe...</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-civilrights.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=277655</guid>
<enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-civilrights.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=277655" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
<item>
<title>For Sale: Supreme Court Seats</title>
<link>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-line.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278063</link>
<description>  Take a brief snapshot tour of American history in your mind. Picture those photos of unemployed Depression-era men lining up for free soup. Sanitation workers in Memphis holding signs reading "I am a man," all in a line. Gay couples lined up at the justice of the peace waiting for their marriage licenses.   There's another line that's been formed since friday in Washington outside the Supreme Court. Two historic cases on gay marriage Tuesday and Wednesday, and, as you'd guess, the public wants in. There are about 50 seats up for grabs, available to the public on a first-come first-served basis. So people, naturally, are lining up.    Standing in line seems a fair, democratic, American way to get the hottest ticket in America on Tuesday.   But it turns out there are many in line who might not really care what's going on inside. Why? Because they are line sitters — paid by someone with deep enough pockets to get someone to save them a place. They're not breaking any laws, but in the spirit of us all having...</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-line.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278063</guid>
<enclosure url="https://chrt.fm/track/53A61E/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-line.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=278063" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
<item>
<title>For Sale: Supreme Court Seats</title>
<link>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-line.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278063</link>
<description>  Take a brief snapshot tour of American history in your mind. Picture those photos of unemployed Depression-era men lining up for free soup. Sanitation workers in Memphis holding signs reading "I am a man," all in a line. Gay couples lined up at the justice of the peace waiting for their marriage licenses.   There's another line that's been formed since friday in Washington outside the Supreme Court. Two historic cases on gay marriage Tuesday and Wednesday, and, as you'd guess, the public wants in. There are about 50 seats up for grabs, available to the public on a first-come first-served basis. So people, naturally, are lining up.    Standing in line seems a fair, democratic, American way to get the hottest ticket in America on Tuesday.   But it turns out there are many in line who might not really care what's going on inside. Why? Because they are line sitters — paid by someone with deep enough pockets to get someone to save them a place. They're not breaking any laws, but in the spirit of us all having...</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-line.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=278063</guid>
<enclosure url="https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-line.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=278063" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are Gay Rights More Akin to Civil Rights or Religious Rights?</title>
<link>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-civilrights.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=277655</link>
<description>  This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider two gay marriage cases.   Tomorrow, they hear arguments on Hollingsworth v. Perry, a case that centers on the state constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriages in California — also known as Proposition 8. A federal appeals court ruled it unconstitutional in 2012, but supporters are asking for the Supreme Court to review the ruling.   On Wednesday, there's United States v. Windsor. This case challenges the federal Defense of Marriage Act, adopted in 1996, which prohibits most federal benefits from going to gay married couples.    Reverend Oliver White  is the pastor of Grace Community United Church of Christ, a predominantly black congregation in St. Paul, Minnesota. He  announced his acceptance  of same-sex marriage in 2005, when, at a United Church of Christ assembly, he voted in favor of a church resolution for gay marriage. He sees gay rights as akin to black civil rights.   But  Ann Pellegrini  disagrees. She is white and gay and says she doe...</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-civilrights.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;awEpisodeId=277655</guid>
<enclosure url="https://pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/takeaway/takeaway032513-civilrights.mp3?awCollectionId=361&amp;amp;awEpisodeId=277655" type="audio/mpeg" length="1"/>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
